top of page

Going Overboard

  • Writer: Peter K F Cheung SBS
    Peter K F Cheung SBS
  • Jan 6, 2021
  • 3 min read
  1. FADE IN.


  2. Act 1


  3. INT. OFFICE - DAY


  4. PETER gets a file from a PROSECUTOR.


  5. PROSECUTOR: The Court directed that the prosecution and the defence should agree non-contentious facts before the trial. But if the defence suggests any expert report to be agreed, don't agree to that...


  6. PETER (V.O): True, if the expert says in the expert report that the defendant didn't have the guilty mind when the offence was committed and I've agreed to admit it for the prosecution as fiat counsel, the prosecution won't have a prima facie case.


  7. Peter nods.


  8. PETER (V.O.) (Cont'd): In the spirit of cooperation to save everybody's time in court trials, a word of caution of not going overboard is good.


  9. INT. STUDY - DAY


  10. Peter is checking a mail with his phone.


  11. PETER (V.O.): Oh, the defence does seek my agreement to admit an expert report. I won't agree.


  12. Peter replies.


  13. Act 2


  14. INT. OFFICE - DAY


  15. Files on a table, Peter is working behind a desktop computer.


  16. PETER (V.O.): I'd better get prepared to cross-examine a psychiatrist.


  17. As he researches, he jots notes.


  18. INT. COURT - DAY


  19. The Court isn't in session yet, a defence COUNSEL is talking to Peter.


  20. COUNSEL: Why wouldn't you agree to admit the defence's expert report?


  21. PETER: I don't even have a copy of the expert report.


  22. A LAWYER then gives Peter a copy. Peter reads it right away.


  23. COUNSEL: Our Expert will give evidence and you can cross-examine him.


  24. PETER : Thank you. As to other formalities, I'm easy.


  25. They make some amendments on a sheet of paper just before the court session begins.


  26. MONTAGE OF THE DUE PROCESS


  27. A. Peter submits a typed sheet with alterations to the COURT before reading its content in public.


  28. B. Peter calls WITNESS#1, examining her in chief.


  29. C. After the defence's cross-examination of Witness#1, Peter re-examines her briefly.

  30. D. Peter calls WITNESS#2, and the process is repeated.


  31. E. The Court rules that the prosecution has made a prima facie case.


  32. F. COUNSEL calls the EXPERT witness and does the examination in chief.


  33. END MONTAGE


  34. Peter is observing and listening to the Expert attentively.


  35. PETER (V.O.): The expert got his MB. BS. in 1978. If I went to the medical school after matriculation, we should be in the same class.


  36. Peter also reads the expert report from time to time.


  37. PETER (V.O.) (Cont'd): In the witness box, the expert is now talking "very probably" consistently, but in his report, he wrote "probably".


  38. Peter circles the words "probably" in the expert report.


  39. PETER (V.O.) (Cont'd): In order to get my message across with strength, I've to deal with his exaggeration first. I've to take a destructive strategy upfront.


  40. Thinking.


  41. PETER (V.O.) (Cont'd): But I'd try to end my cross-examination on a high note.


  42. As Counsel finishes her exam-in-chief, Peter rises to cross-examine the Expert. And we hear the Expert saying... I could have written "very probably"...


  43. PETER: What criteria did you use to determine your diagnosis?


  44. EXPERT: It's the American standard...

  45. PETER: Is it the Diagnostic and Statistics Manual of Mental Disorder?


  46. EXPERT: Yes.


  47. Peter continues his cross-examination of the Expert, as the AUDIENCE in the gallery watches attentively. Then, COUNSEL raises an objection to the Court.


  48. COUNSEL: It appears that the prosecuting Counsel is giving expert evidence himself.


  49. PETER (V.O.): Have I gone overboard with the thrill of cross-examination?


  50. PETER: I'm no expert. I'm just using my common-sense knowledge to cross-examine the Expert...


  51. Act 3


  52. INT. COURT - CONTINUOUS


  53. PETER (Cont'd): Let me reframe and ask my last question. Do you agree that even a patient suffering from depression can still make right decisions within milliseconds?


  54. EXPERT: ...Yes...


  55. PETER (V.O): That's how I end my cross-examination on a high note.


  56. INT. OFFICE - DAY


  57. Peter is writing something in a file.


  58. PETER (V.O.): My decades of self-training on active listening has paid off.


  59. Reflecting.


  60. PETER (V.O.)(Cont'd): I pay attention to a speaker's verbal and non-verbal language to fully understand what they're trying to communicate.


  61. Pausing.


  62. PETER (V.O.)(Cont'd): Not only that I can remember the key points of a speaker's message, I'd also analyse them with a view to raising the levels of explanation.


  63. Pausing.


  64. PETER (V.O.)(Cont'd): And then, I'd respond to the speaker by asking sharp questions embedding my different views.


  65. Thinking.


  66. PETER (V.O.)(Cont'd): There's no harm going overboard, intellectually speaking.


  67. Peter smiles


  68. FADE OUT.


  69. THE END

ree

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
The Third Way

FADE IN Act 1 INT. SKYLINE TOWER - 09:30 Sitting area. PETER sits on a sofa, a smartphone in his hand. PETER (V.O.): Completing my first task of the morning leaves me feeling relaxed and accomplished.

 
 
 
The Routine

FADE IN Act 1 INT. LIVING ROOM -09:30 Morning light cut across the room. PETER holds a smartphone, reviewing papers on screen. PETER (V.O.): Although someone will bring the hard copies to me at the Ce

 
 
 
Kaji: The Coming and Going of Bright Things

FADE I N   Act 1   INT. HOME - MORNING (A WEEK AGO) The sky outside is soft. KAJI wakes. She stretches. Her ears then pitch forward, absorbing every faint sound from inside the apartment. KAJI (V.O.):

 
 
 

Comments


  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • LinkedIn Social Icon

+(852) 6819 8258

Fortune Chambers, 2305, Tower Two,

Lippo Centre, 89 Queensway, Hong Kong 

©2017 BY PETER KAM FAI CHEUNG. PROUDLY CREATED WITH WIX.COM

bottom of page